19 Comments
User's avatar
Caleb Cooper's avatar

Hey Ken! I’m one of those pesky electrician’s that’s been working in the industry for over 20 years and I love your work. It’s cool see how much people don’t pay attention to magnetism- it’s because it’s not universally taught. Most people in my field don’t even understand how a transformer works, the best answer you might hear is “magnetic induction “! It’s just something that most don’t bother diving deeper into. The corner of the magnet is the best thing to look into. While I haven’t seen all your videos yet, I have not seen one from you about cube shaped magnets and their corners . Each corner is like a pyramid shape, with a magnetic field that looks very similar to pyramid’s magnetic field. When you start combining these shapes upon their corners, in a circle, evenly spaced every ten degrees, you may wind up with something that gets certain groups to want to steal your research and discredit you. But a video on corner magnetism with a Ferrocell would be awesome!

Michael Myrick's avatar

If Nature never wastes geometry, what single geometric principle do you think she's repeating from the atom to the galaxy? 🤔🍻🫶🏼🙏🏼♾️

Sweet Pea CC's avatar

Thank you Ken! Here is a link to one of "Does it Work?" videos on magnetic vortex https://youtu.be/wV8DqMBzkIc

When searching it up, youtube had it burred deep in the results.

bart dooper's avatar

Dear ken, nice graph about magnet strengths and spatial field sizes. I didn't learn this in the technical school. At my work I warned engineers about this, because they didn't learn that either. Thanks, and cheers!

Patrik Holmqvist's avatar

Big fan of your work Ken. Have you ever thought about why physics was turned into Einstein and Quantum craziness? I'd say it had to do with the MM experiment. An interferometer can confirm Earth's rotation but not it's motion around the Sun. We do know it does move because of annual stellar parallax and the precession, but what if that motion is very slow and not around the Sun?

In that case there's no need for relativism and Lorentz contraction. Ether physics then works fine just as is. Look into the Tychos model www.tychos.space

Jared's avatar

Another concise, easy to digest article for the average Joe like myself Ken, love and gratitude brother.

Caleb Cooper's avatar

Your statement that center always holds true is very accurate. These are some common wiring diagrams for voltage transformers, which are just a bit of copper wire wound around a magnetic iron core. There are 3 in a box Y (wye) configuration, and its center is the reference point for the voltage. It’s the “neutral”point of the system. It’s always in the center.

Caleb Cooper's avatar

The crop circle artists are showing the conventional models are incorrect, and the pattern with four vortices is correct.

Simeon Vercher Llinares's avatar

Since light/ilumination is a disturbance of the medium and nature always work in a curvilinear way the lateral transmission of that disturbance must have always a curvilinear shape regardless of the refraction ( which just bends it further) .I'm I correct?

john haggar's avatar

....If "magnitude" is the only TRUE dimension, and it is immeasurable (Do not say you perceive its depth Ananda..That is to claim measure where none can be taken) - Then the universe is fundamentally SCALE FREE (you can treat "magnitude" as zero thereby giving dimension-less "unity"...OR, by using the zero powers rule, treating it as "infinite" (making all finite measures vanish). Both lead to the same conclusion, only relational structure has meaning. . the "universe" is fundamentally asymmetrical this is why our language (geometry) fails with something as simple as Pi (remember Edgar Buckingham...?...) there are no "perfect" circles or spheres, everything is asymmetrical, Pi appears because we try to force symmetry where there is none, this asymmetry presents itself as "pi" (the universe does not care which "names" or "labels" we might apply to its "phenomena", all it knows (if even this) is "motion"........neutrinos DO NOT "MOVE"....they change flavour.."space" is present (if it were absent, even motion would be impossible) the "natural unit" of "presence" is............beneath is the substrate, your "magnitude zero" my "Dimension: One" (the universe does not care what labels/ names we use.........etc) My best regards Ken :)

Ken wheeler's avatar

magnitude by definition IS scale, ROFL ROFL

john haggar's avatar

Hmmm.... "Magnitude" is Ontological , "scale" is relational ?......

Caleb Cooper's avatar

The soul is magnetic in nature,

Whenever a person dies they will lose 7 grams of mass almost instantly. Is this due to the aetheric gravity of the soul itself having left the body? We may never know, but it is my theory. Its magnetic nature is what keeps many “bound” to the phi-cycle realm .

Ken wheeler's avatar

dielectric not magnetic

Caleb Cooper's avatar

E0 you may be right